![]() |
||
| |
||
| Q4 2004 | ||
| |
|
|
| |
||
| World Class Success Leads to Next World Class Project |
World's deepest subsea development. Multiple operatorswith multiple fieldslooking for cost effective synergies and to share new infrastructure. Fast track schedule.
Been there, done that. INTEC assembled an engineering team whose key members had been leaders on the successful deepwater Canyon Express project (see QJ Winter 2001) for BP's King’s Peak, Total's Aconcagua and Marathon's Camden Hills developments in water depths up to 7300 feet. A group of companies, known as the Atwater Valley Producers, chose this project team in February 2004 to perform the Concept Engineering for development of their fields in the Atwater Valley, Desoto Canyon, and Lloyd Ridge areas of the eastern Gulf of Mexico. It is approximately 180 miles south of Mobile, Alabama, in water depths up to 9200 feet. This was followed with the same INTEC team performing the Front End Engineering Design (FEED) that started in May. INTEC continues to provide engineering support during the Execution Phase that has just started. First production is expected in 2007.
Atwater Valley Producers and Fields
Six fields are currently planned for the initial development. Atlas and Atlas NW, on Lloyd Ridge Blocks 5 and 4950, are owned and operated by Anadarko. Jubilee, on Atwater Valley Blocks 305 and 349 and Lloyd Ridge Blocks 265 and 309, is also owned and operated by Anadarko. Merganser, on Atwater Valley Blocks 3637, is operated by KerrMcGee and has Devon as a partner. San Jacinto, on DeSoto Canyon Blocks 618619, is operated by Dominion and has Spinnaker and KerrMcGee as partners. Spiderman, on DeSoto Canyon Blocks 620621, is operated by Anadarko and has Dominion and Spinnaker as partners. Vortex, on Atwater Valley Blocks 217 and 261 and Lloyd Ridge Blocks 177 and 221, is jointly owned by Anadarko and KerrMcGee. The wells will be completed subsea and tied uninsulated flowlines in a hub and spoke arrangement to Independence Hub, a 105foot deepdraft, semisubmersible platform to be located in Mississippi Canyon Block 920 in a water depth of 8000 feet. It will have a twolevel production deck which will be capable of processing 850 million cubic feet of gas per day. Anadarko will operate the platform that Enterprise Product Partners will design, construct, install and own. Heerema Marine Contractors will transport and install the hull and mooring systems. INTEC is also providing engineering support to Enterprise Product Partners for the 140 miles of 24inch export pipeline, named Independence Trail. There are six main production flowlines servicing the fields, comprising of the Northeastern, Eastern, Southern, and Western areas. Spiderman forms the hub for the Northeast areas, with San Jacinto to the West tied in via intrafield flowlines and produced back to the host through dual 8inch and 10inch flowlines. Atlas and Atlas NW fields are located in the Eastern area and are produced back to the host through a single 8inch flowline. Jubilee and Vortex are produced from the southern spoke through dual 8inch and 10inch flowlines run in parallel. Merganser has a single dedicated 10inch flowline in the Western area. Umbilicals are routed to the four areas generally following the flowline routes, with subsequent Subsea Umbilical Termination Assemblies (SUTAs) and intrafield umbilicals to service the outlying fields from the area hubs. Where infield umbilicals are required, Stab and Hinge Over (SHO) assemblies will be used to terminate the umbilicals at the main umbilical SUTA.
Project Challenges
|
| |
||
| Chevron Texaco Blind Faith Field Development |
|
ChevronTexaco's Blind Faith prospect is another of the Gulf of Mexico's growing list of deepwater developments challenging the industry's current technology. Blind Faith is located in Mississippi Canyon Blocks 695 and 696 at a water depth of approximately 7,000 feet. The discovery well was drilled by British Petroleum (BP) in 2001. BP and ChevronTexaco (CVX) agreed in September 2003 that CVX would operate the field. To obtain more reservoir data, an appraisal well was drilled in the first quarter of 2004 and sidetracked in the second quarter.
INTEC has been assisting CVX in evaluating development options and supporting CVX's steps through their project evaluation process, ChevronTexaco Project Development and Execution Process (CPDEP), since April 2004. The options identified were in two categories; subsea tiebacks to existing facilities and new build local host facilities. CVX has not selected an option at this time. Robert Money led a team to assist CVX with the first half of their Phase 2 step for CPDEP by developing a detailed cost estimate for several development options that are being considered. The three month study included establishing a base case field architecture and preliminary engineering in flow assurance, riser analysis, corrosion as well as addressing flowline sizing, routing, expansion and insulation requirements. EDG Consulting Engineers provided costs for topsides equipment in each of the cases. A team of INTEC staff led by Ron Ledbetter started work on the second half of Phase 2 Concept Selection, as part of a joint project team comprised of EDG Consulting Engineers and INTEC. The scope of work was to identify viable development options, develop these options for evaluation, prepare detailed cost estimates for each option, evaluate the options, and help CVX select preferred options to carry into Front End Engineering (FEED). INTEC was responsible for subsea equipment including trees, cals, jumpers, PLETS, flowlines, and risers. INTEC also provided support for their evaluation of hull structures and flow assurance support. Included as part of INTEC's scope of work was the evaluation of several technologies that might be considered in the development plan. Studies were performed for artificial lift, subsea multiphase flowmeters, subsea multiphase pumping, High Integrity Pipeline Protection System (HIPPS), electric flowline heating, subsea chemical injection distribution system, and riserbase gaslift. Position papers were prepared for those technologies not fitting into the Blind Faith development plan. For those technologies with potential to add value, recommendations for further development in FEED will be given in the technical reports produced for each. |
| |
||
| A Note from the CEO | ||
|
Growing Pains?
The oil and gas industry is actually quite small in people terms, despite the large projects we execute. When you further subdivide the industry into offshore and, All this familiarity makes for a chummy and cozy atmosphere at industry gatherings and celebrations. However, there are also some downsides to this tight community. When we need to expand, our small 'club' has trouble accommodating the growth. We don't, unfortunately, have a steady supply of young people willing to join us. Of course, the blame lies predominantly at our feet. We have let our collective reputations be soiled by others who really don't know or, worse, care about the facts, and we have let the cyclical nature of the petroleum market whipsaw our employees in and out of the business, offering no steady lifelong opportunity. The result is an aging workforce in a world steadily demanding more oil and gas to fuel rapidly expanding economies like India and China. How do we cope with this dichotomy? One response that we have seen recently is to lure employees from one segment of our industry to another, i.e. from service providers to clients. I can only see this as a zero sum game with no ultimate winners. If neither service companies nor operators are sufficiently inclined to increase the talent pool, then we will just cycle the same folks back and forth with no net inflow of resources, only higher costs. To solve this problem I believe our clients have to |
answer the fundamental question of what they need from the service companies. Do they want a repository of well trained, highly responsive, competitive providers and appliers of the best solutions and technology available or do they want specialized training grounds for developing future staff for themselves? Maybe it's a bit of both. However, I am sure that a staff of in-house managers is ultimately the solution they seek. As a service industry, I know we can accommodate the former, but we all understand that acute business pressures often dictate that short-term solutions be pursued. There are answers to the situation we find ourselves in, but, as I see it, they take cooperative approaches. Neither side can solve it alone. I would like to suggest that we address the root cause - that is the limited influx of new talent.
From an engineering service provider's point of view, we face two hurdles when deciding to hire new graduates. One is that new graduates, as in all companies, have limited utility or billability until they have received sufficient training. Secondly, most of our clients want only the 'most experienced' folks on their projects. While I completely understand this requirement, it does pose a difficult dilemma. How do we reconcile our, and a client's, need to introduce new talent into the resource pool and concurrently provide the right level of skill and experience to get the job done? Perhaps a solution could be built around the formation of a partnership between the service provider and the client. The service provider could select and recruit new graduates at their expense, but with the client’s needs in mind. The new graduate's training period costs could be shared between both with training time actually being spent in both companies. Part of the training would naturally be spent on the client’s projects. The costs to both participants would be minimized while developing these new resources. You can imagine many variants of this scheme, including training graduates hired by the client, and several issues which would need further clarification, but I believe we must start somewhere to resolve our joint concerns. The naturally symbiotic relationship with our clients should be used to our advantage to increase the talent pool, not squandered by competing for a same pool with no value added in the end.
Johnny Reed |
|
| |
||
| The BG Egypt Energy Challenge |
|
The first ever BG Egypt Energy Challenge Event was held December 34 and was a great success. It was organized by BG Egypt and by CARE Egypt with the aim to increase the awareness of CARE's ongoing charity projects in Egypt as well as to raise valuable funds in the most fun and exciting way possible. Christopher Burnett (Captain) and Christiana Ellah from the London Office were partnered by David Hughes and Habib Molla Farajzadeh from the Delft Office forming the inaugural Team INTEC.
The first day of the Event was comprised of a 15 km hike across flat desert, through canyons, valleys and oases. Needless to say, this was a combination of blissful relaxation and extreme pain bittersweet experience for four 'not exactly fit' young people. 117 people in 26 teams started out with an easy walk along the feet of several mountains, followed by a hike up the narrow ridge of Mt. Hudra (where the pain began). After enjoying the wonderful panoramic scenery of Wadi Rum from the summit, it was time to descend to the oases of Ain Hudra through very slippery rocks, to say the least, and continue on through the stunningly beautiful White Canyon. This was really pretty though some of us had to hold on to each other for support since at this time our muscles were extremely sore and our mobility through the loose sand was a challenge. Christiana encouraged the team with her singing, which was partly to keep herself moving. After surviving the first day, we were awakened at 4:30 am by Chris screaming as he jumped out the cold shower on the start of our second day. We were told it was only a couple of hours climbing to the summit of Egypt's highest mountain, Mt. Katherine, at 2640 m. What the organizers had forgotten to mention was the 5 km "warm up" walk to the base of the mountain which was made increasingly difficult with the temperature as low as 3°C and the protests from our muscles and feet. However, once we had started the accent we forgot the pain and were left mesmerized by more breathtaking scenery made more wondrous by the morning rays of sunlight making the red granite rocks of the St Katherine Protectorate appear golden. We were following one of the trails less frequented by tourists, which was further enhanced by walking side by side with camels and rock hyrax, which seemed to find the route much easier than we did. This whole journey was crowned with the beautiful view from the top of the mountain. Blue skies, a gentle breeze and scenery that will leave anybody speechless. The descent over the loose stones was perilous and by now our bodies had enough’ and a few old injuries resurfaced to add to the screams coming from our legs and feet! These could not dampen our spirits and Team INTEC crossed the finish line in unison proud to have taken part in a great event. We finished 13th out of the 26 teams that participated in this event alongside other companies mainly from the oil and gas industry. The event surpassed its original goal and raised an impressive 180,000 USD, which will be used in various CARE development projects in Upper Egypt such as basic education, water sanitation and agricultural advancement for the poor communities. Further information about the event and Care Egypt projects can be found on the CARE web page www.care.org.eg. |
| |
||
| |
||
| INTEC Engineering, Inc. Intercontinental Building 15600 JFK Boulevard, 9th Floor Houston, TX 77032, USA tel: (281) 987-0800 Primary Fax: (281) 987-3838 Admin Fax: (281) 987-2002 e-mail: info@intec-hou.com |
![]() |
INTEC Engineering (SEA) SDN. BHD. Suite 12.2, 12th Floor Menara Aik Hua Changkat Raja Chulan 50200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Tel: +60 (3) 202-2488 Fax: +60 (3) 202-3488 e-mail: info@intec-mal.com.my |
![]() |
INTEC Engineering B.V. Poortweg 14 2612 PA Delft, The Netherlands P.O. Box 3178 2601 DD Delft, The Netherlands tel: +31 (15) 256-5675 FAX: +31 (015) 256-0194 email: info@intec-delft.com |
![]() | INTEC Engineering S.R.L. Lavalle #465 Planta Baja 1047, Buenos Aires Argentina tel: +54 (1) 14 327-4120 FAX: +54 (1) 14 327-4121 email: info@intec-hou.com |
![]() |
INTEC-egis Adelaide House 200, Adelaide Terrace Perth, Western Australia 6000 tel: + 61 (8) 9220 9374 FAX: + 61 (8) 9325 9897 email: info@intec-hou.com |